Search found 23 matches

by lbw
22 Aug 2020, 04:59
Forum: Radius
Topic: Plugins?
Replies: 0
Views: 740

Plugins?

I noticed in the RADIUS code there's infrastructure for a rad_plugin_t and plugins. These seem to be able modify requests. However, there's no where to specify them or load them in the configuration. Am I misunderstanding the purpose of this code or is it mostly there but just missing some surroundi...
by lbw
13 Aug 2020, 12:56
Forum: PPPoE
Topic: So I had put accel-ppp live with heavy load
Replies: 45
Views: 11541

Re: So I had put accel-ppp live with heavy load

I'm using Debian 9 but your issue sounds like it is more network related. Check your NIC buffers and your switch port buffers and statistics.
by lbw
18 Jul 2020, 12:11
Forum: PPPoE
Topic: So I had put accel-ppp live with heavy load
Replies: 45
Views: 11541

Re: So I had put accel-ppp live with heavy load

I'm running accel-ppp on multiple servers each doing 3Gbps load with mixture of PPPoE and L2TP without issue (touch wood) using 10-Gigabit X540-AT2, 4.9.0-11-amd64 and 8 x E3-1270 and accel-ppp has been running for about 150 days with ~1000 sessions. Can you scale horizontally?
by lbw
18 Jul 2020, 11:56
Forum: L2TP
Topic: accel-ppp as a L2TP LAC?
Replies: 2
Views: 1828

Re: accel-ppp as a L2TP LAC?

No solution. I was hoping @dimka88 might shed some light if this is possible with the current code or if I need to try and patch it so I don't spend a hours trying to work it out.
by lbw
29 May 2020, 12:05
Forum: L2TP
Topic: L2TP internal queue is never drained resulting in no new sessions allowed
Replies: 1
Views: 446

Re: L2TP internal queue is never drained resulting in no new sessions allowed

Looking further at this, because it keeps happening, I've gathered the following logs (with some extra debugging entires added by me): [2020-05-27 10:25:01]: info: l2tp tunnel 20306-17769 (1.2.3.233:1701): retransmission #1 [2020-05-27 10:25:01]: info: l2tp tunnel 20306-17769 (1.2.3.233:1701): retra...
by lbw
12 Mar 2020, 10:30
Forum: PPPoE
Topic: Adding PPPoE interface with QinQ with accel-cmd misses inside tag
Replies: 4
Views: 401

Re: Adding PPPoE interface with QinQ with accel-cmd misses inside tag

That does not solve the problem and in fact, makes it worse in the following use case: 1. You cannot run say: accel-cmd# pppoe interface add eth3.2702.1200 Without the interface eth3.2702.1200 being up. Usually, the interface associated with the c-tag will be auto-created by accel-ppp. Therefore, I ...
by lbw
05 Mar 2020, 07:41
Forum: Feature requests
Topic: Shaper - Factor default speed received
Replies: 1
Views: 402

Re: Shaper - Factor default speed received

Do this in your RADIUS server. It's not a job for a BRAS.
by lbw
23 Feb 2020, 03:01
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Problem with Vlan-mon and Intel X710/X722
Replies: 6
Views: 614

Re: Problem with Vlan-mon and Intel X710/X722

It might be worth switching to a X540 or X520. They are relatively cheap and see if that solves your problem?
by lbw
23 Feb 2020, 02:59
Forum: PPPoE
Topic: Adding PPPoE interface with QinQ with accel-cmd misses inside tag
Replies: 4
Views: 401

Re: Adding PPPoE interface with QinQ with accel-cmd misses inside tag

I'm using 0x8100 rather than 0x8a88. It doesn't really matter either way I've found. I can reproduce it if I do a: pppoe interface add eth3.1234 What I see in the tcpdump capture on the interface is: - PADI comes in with S and C tags - PADO goes out with S tag only My config is this: vlan-mon=re:eth...
by lbw
23 Feb 2020, 02:56
Forum: PPPoE
Topic: So I had put accel-ppp live with heavy load
Replies: 45
Views: 11541

Re: So I had put accel-ppp live with heavy load

Yep, as per the following config:

[core]
...
thread-count=8

You should have one thread per core. I haven't turned my mind to if one thread per hyper-thread would be better.