Search found 36 matches
- 24 Jun 2019, 21:06
- Forum: L2TP
- Topic: ACCEL-PPP compared to L2TPNS
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8997
Re: ACCEL-PPP compared to L2TPNS
Hi, can ACCEL-PPP bind to multiple IP addresses at once? When using L2TPNS it will only bind/ listen on one IP address per server. This usually means you have to put the LNS on a downstream IP instead of the IP's provided by your L2TP provider. Can you also confirm if domain stripping is supported o...
- 24 Jun 2019, 15:43
- Forum: L2TP
- Topic: ACCEL-PPP compared to L2TPNS
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8997
Re: ACCEL-PPP compared to L2TPNS
If I have a number of ACCEL-PPP LNS receiving L2TP sessions from various LTS.
What's the best way to redistribute the kernel/PPP routes from each ACCEL-PPP LNS, so that my BGP routers know where to route traffic for each L2TP session?
Do I need to install Quagga on each ACCEL-PPP LNS and run IBGP?
What's the best way to redistribute the kernel/PPP routes from each ACCEL-PPP LNS, so that my BGP routers know where to route traffic for each L2TP session?
Do I need to install Quagga on each ACCEL-PPP LNS and run IBGP?
- 12 Jun 2019, 14:06
- Forum: L2TP
- Topic: ACCEL-PPP compared to L2TPNS
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8997
Re: ACCEL-PPP compared to L2TPNS
Hi,
Thanks for your inputs.
I am compiling at the moment for Debian Stretch.
If I just need L2TP as a LNS, can I skip installing the drivers for IPOE, VLAN_MON and PPTP?
Are there any other considerations for the configuration specifically sliming down the install?
Thanks for your inputs.
I am compiling at the moment for Debian Stretch.
If I just need L2TP as a LNS, can I skip installing the drivers for IPOE, VLAN_MON and PPTP?
Are there any other considerations for the configuration specifically sliming down the install?
- 12 Jun 2019, 09:42
- Forum: L2TP
- Topic: ACCEL-PPP compared to L2TPNS
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8997
Re: ACCEL-PPP compared to L2TPNS
Hi, I specifically wondered about FIFO scheduling because I have had issues with packet order and jitter (variation in the delay of packets) in L2TP tunnels when a server is under load using other solutions. It's good to hear you are developing a Cluster based solution. Is there a roadmap for this? ...
- 11 Jun 2019, 15:46
- Forum: L2TP
- Topic: ACCEL-PPP compared to L2TPNS
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8997
Re: ACCEL-PPP compared to L2TPNS
Hi, This sounds very good. What about the packet scheduling policy, how do you guarantee packet order for traffic inside each L2TP session. Is there a FIFO (Frist In First Out) QoS process? In L2TPNS servers work in a cluster using a multicast address to communicate state information among members. ...
- 10 Jun 2019, 21:02
- Forum: L2TP
- Topic: ACCEL-PPP compared to L2TPNS
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8997
ACCEL-PPP compared to L2TPNS
Hi All, I was wondering if anyone has compared the L2TP LNS performance of ACCEL-PPP to L2TPNS http://git.sameswireless.fr/l2tpns.git? I'm looking for a fast and reliable replacement to L2TPNS that is multi-threaded and regularly updated. Is the L2TP Kernel Mode support using the TUN/TAP interface p...