Looks pretty strange, I can propose you check carefully overlapped params, like some listen ports.
Also, I saw that it is working on one of our clients BRAS with 2 accel-ppp instances and it works
Search found 866 matches
- 30 Jan 2022, 17:48
- Forum: General
- Topic: not writing to logfiles
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4385
- 30 Jan 2022, 17:44
- Forum: General
- Topic: accel-ppp + debian11 + rps
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4634
Re: accel-ppp + debian11 + rps
Hi @proca, do you have 16 CPU cores? Why do you define exactly fffe?
- 30 Jan 2022, 17:41
- Forum: L2TP
- Topic: Interface not created until first L2TP session established.
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5744
Re: Interface not created until first L2TP session established.
You have to check all rules, show me an output
Code: Select all
iptables -t raw -L -n -v
- 30 Jan 2022, 11:43
- Forum: L2TP
- Topic: Incorrect mtu set for L2TP interfaces
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3193
Re: Incorrect mtu set for L2TP interfaces
Hi tj-19, check docs
[l2tp] has 1420 as mtu by default
[l2tp] has 1420 as mtu by default
ppp-max-mtu=n
By default ppp-max-mtu=1420
Set the maximum MTU value that can be negotiated for PPP over L2TP sessions.
[\quote]
- 25 Jan 2022, 07:48
- Forum: General
- Topic: not writing to logfiles
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4385
Re: not writing to logfiles
Hi @hashbang, did you check permission to these files and dir
Code: Select all
ls -lah /var/log/accel-ppp/
ps ax | grep accel
- 25 Jan 2022, 07:46
- Forum: PPPoE
- Topic: NetFlow accounting on PPPoE interfaces?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3712
Re: NetFlow accounting on PPPoE interfaces?
Hi @marekm, looks like it is some restriction in VyOS. Accel-ppp does not restrict this. Try to read a bit more about pmacct netflow collector
- 11 Jan 2022, 18:10
- Forum: General
- Topic: Ошибка "mlibnetlink: RTNETLINK answers: File exists"
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5935
Re: Ошибка "mlibnetlink: RTNETLINK answers: File exists"
Опишите воспроизведение ситуации на портале разработки https://phabricator.accel-ppp.org/
- 10 Jan 2022, 19:51
- Forum: L2TP
- Topic: Interface not created until first L2TP session established.
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5744
Re: Interface not created until first L2TP session established.
Hi @tj-19, why you can not use + char in this case?
ifname=l2tp0%d this said that you will have l2tp00, l2tp01 ...
Also, does not possible to have the same name for the second interface
Code: Select all
iptables -t raw -I PREROUTING -i l2tp+ -j CT --notrack
iptables -t raw -I OUTPUT -o l2tp+ -j CT –notrack
Also, does not possible to have the same name for the second interface
- 29 Dec 2021, 09:28
- Forum: PPPoE
- Topic: Большая часть пользователей не работают
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3766
Re: Большая часть пользователей не работают
Начните решение проблемы с разделения auth и acct радиус
Code: Select all
server=172.24.0.3,bras,auth-port=1812,acct-port=0,req-limit=50,fail-timeout=0,max-fail=10,weight=1
server=172.24.0.3,bras,auth-port=0,acct-port=1813,req-limit=0,fail-timeout=0,max-fail=10,weight=1
- 24 Dec 2021, 08:59
- Forum: Feature requests
- Topic: VRF Implementation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7625