Search found 36 matches

by tj-19
14 Mar 2022, 15:34
Forum: General
Topic: Networking stops when using ACCEL-PPP
Replies: 1
Views: 2837

Networking stops when using ACCEL-PPP

Hi All, My Network Interface failed on my ACCEL-PPP/L2TP server. In the system log, I see loads of the following entries:- System-networkd[794] l2tp019: LINK UP System-networkd[794]: Gained carrier Kernel: [74442.582804] l2tp019: renamed from ppp68. Then I40e 0000:01:00.0: ARQ: Unknown event 0x0000 ...
by tj-19
13 Mar 2022, 02:34
Forum: General
Topic: Tweaks for best performance
Replies: 1
Views: 3650

Tweaks for best performance

Hi All,

Are there any tweaks such as buffers/sysctl or ethtool that will increase the performance of ACCEL?

Thanks,
by tj-19
16 Feb 2022, 19:34
Forum: L2TP
Topic: Interface not created until first L2TP session established.
Replies: 4
Views: 5767

Re: Interface not created until first L2TP session established.

Hi, iptables -t raw -L -n -v Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 99022 packets, 54M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 17109 4671K CT all -- l2tp+ * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 CT notrack Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 40338 packets, 44M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source dest...
by tj-19
27 Jan 2022, 14:45
Forum: L2TP
Topic: Incorrect mtu set for L2TP interfaces
Replies: 1
Views: 3215

Incorrect mtu set for L2TP interfaces

Hi, I've got the following set under ppp:- min-mtu=1280 mtu=1500 mru=1500 I can't see such a setting under L2TP. When the L2TP tunnels establish, ifconfig l2tp00 etc. shows the mtu is 1420. The CPE connecting is set to 1500 and the path should allow 1500. if I type ifconfig l2tp00 mtu 1500, this wil...
by tj-19
27 Jan 2022, 14:41
Forum: L2TP
Topic: Interface not created until first L2TP session established.
Replies: 4
Views: 5767

Re: Interface not created until first L2TP session established.

Hi,

I'm using Ubuntu with a Xanmod Kernel 5.15.16-xanmod1

I've added the rules to my iptables as above. But a conntrack -D shows IP'a via the l2tp intefaces are still being tracked.

Any ideas how to fix this?
by tj-19
10 Jan 2022, 17:19
Forum: L2TP
Topic: Interface not created until first L2TP session established.
Replies: 4
Views: 5767

Interface not created until first L2TP session established.

I would like to setup various rules to disable connection tracking for the l2tp interface. Normally I would do this by the interface name. However, in ACCEL-PPP the interface is not created until the first session comes in. I’ve set ifname=l2tp0%d to l2tp0 to make all interfaces l2tp0. I then want t...
by tj-19
07 Apr 2021, 20:25
Forum: L2TP
Topic: Radius accounting problems
Replies: 2
Views: 7382

Re: Radius accounting problems

Hi Dima, Thanks for the useful input. I’m now able to connect, when setting the accounting port to 0. I wonder if you can tell me how to find out why Radius accounting is not working? When the port is set to 1813 It records the session info in Daloradius before disconnecting. Perhaps Accel-ppp is no...
by tj-19
24 Mar 2021, 22:42
Forum: L2TP
Topic: Radius accounting problems
Replies: 2
Views: 7382

Radius accounting problems

Users are able to connect to L2TP/ Accel-ppp and Radius provides IP address etc. However, Radius accounting fails and the session is then terminated after 3 tries. With the following cause code:- <Acct-Terminate-Cause NAS-Error>] In the Accel-PPP logs I see the following: - ( IP addresses changed fo...
by tj-19
19 Feb 2021, 00:11
Forum: L2TP
Topic: L2TP client for testing with ACCEL-PPP
Replies: 6
Views: 5932

Re: L2TP client for testing with ACCEL-PPP

Hi Dimka, Please see below example config, I have removed all the commented-out code and changed the IP addresses for security. I am using ACCEL-PPP as an L2TP LNS to my providers LAC/LTS. This is why I am using a shared secret. Previously when using L2TPNS I have been able to set the password and c...
by tj-19
04 Feb 2021, 23:21
Forum: L2TP
Topic: L2TP client for testing with ACCEL-PPP
Replies: 6
Views: 5932

Re: L2TP client for testing with ACCEL-PPP

Hi,

Has anyone been able to verify what I have found?

Is it a configuration issue on my side or a bug?

I would be most grateful for any help.