accel-ppp.org

Hi There appears to be a bug in the L2TP code where the queue is never drained of old packets. I am seeing this: [2020-01-02 11:39:13]: debug: l2tp tunnel 48946-60025 (1.2.3.4:1701): 1 message processed from reception queue [2020-01-02 11:39:13]: debug: l2tp tunnel 48946-60025 (1.2.3.4:1701): 0 mess...

Hi This is as much a note for others as a question. Changing shaper by COA works fine: [2019-12-22 18:34:35]: info: ppp89: recv [RADIUS CoA-Request id=a0 <Acct-Session-Id "7317a647d925efeb"> <Filter-Id "20000/20000">] [2019-12-22 18:34:35]: info: ppp89: shaper: changed shaper 200...

That was indeed the problem. Documentation not clear but I should have checked the code more carefully. D'oh.

I shouldn't be required to push a Acct-Interim-Interval attribute in the RADIUS auth reply packet. The configuration should be sufficient. However, I've tried it with that in the auth reply and note that interim accounting then works. I'd rather not to have to set it so looks like there's a bug ther...

Hi I am using accel-ppp version 1.12.0 with PPP over L2TP clients. Configuration is: [modules] log_file l2tp auth_mschap_v1 auth_chap_md5 auth_pap radius ippool shaper ... [radius] dictionary=/usr/local/share/accel-ppp/radius/dictionary nas-identifier=accel-ppp nas-ip-address=a.b.c.d gw-ip-address=a...

Hi I was looking through the L2TP code and it appears, in theory, to have all the right bits to support this but I think the glue isn't present as I can't see how a L2TP tunnel is initiated from accel-ppp other than via the CLI. Can accel-ppp act as a LAC, that is, receive PPP over L2TP sessions and...

Hi I have done my best to look through the source, documentation (of what there is) and some of the forum posts which are predominately in Russian. I have Accel-PPP deployed as a PPPoE BNG with QinQ (802.1ad) traffic coming from the last mile with S/C-tag VLANs. I'm using the latest version from git...